| Stress
Definition
of stress Stress is without a doubt one
of the most overused and perhaps misused words in contemporary western
culture.
It is
generally used to define both the factors that cause stress (stressors)
and the condition of people affected by these factors.
Apart from the
semantic confusion, it is worth observing that the definition of stress
covers a wide range of other situations, including a number of
para-physiological (borderline normal) conditions, and others that are
unquestionably physical and mentally pathological.
A little more
clarity would certainly not go astray in this jungle of sometimes widely
differing definitions and conditions, in order to understand the role that
the discipline we are proposing and other possible treatment strategies
might conceivably play.
Stress is
generally understood to be the interaction between an external condition
(stressful event) and the reaction it arouses in the individual at the
physical, mental or combined physical and mental level.
A distinction
has to be made between: - external stressors - the individual’s
reaction to stress
(link: American
Institute of Stress)
The
role of stress Stress appears to be able to
influence health.
It is believed
that several diseases are aggravated if not actually caused by stress,
especially cardiovascular diseases, cancer, mental disorders, immune
disorders (animal trials have proven that viral infections like herpes
simplex are related to stress).
Within certain
limits, the individual’s response to stressful internal or external
factors may raise performance levels (in this case we refer to
eustress).
(link: Rossi’s Hypotesis, modified by
Ciancaglini)*
*A
number of factors, including external (environmental stressor) and
internal stimuli (psychobiological factors), can contribute to an overall
concept of stress by far exceeding the tradidional behavioural and
psychosocial aetiological conception.
Stress could enhance the
neuropeptide cascade, beginning witrh corticotropine releasing factor
(CRF), proopiomelanocortine (POMC) leading to the release of
corticotropine hormone (ACTH) and the beta endorphyn which coordinate the
chronobiological processes of mind body communication and
healing.
Stress
models Hans Selye, who defines stress as
a physical reaction to external and internal influences, classifies stress
depending on the causes.
Based on
animal experiments Selye claims that stress, which some theories call
general adaptation syndrome, causes the body to pass through three coping
stages:
1) alarm
reaction: which generates a decrease in the individual’s efficiency
and performance levels; 2) resistance: the body summons up
greater efficiency to tolerate the stressful
condition; 3)
exhaustion: physical efficiency wanes
(immune defenses weaken) and disease develops (sometimes even death). This
stage appears if the stress is repeated frequently and becomes
increasingly intense.
The body will
respond to stress either positively or negatively depends on the intensity
and duration of the effort required of the body to cope with the stress,
and its ability to adapt.
Consequently,
stress may be positive (eustress), if it generates drive, efficiency and
enhanced performance, or negative (distress), if it slows, alters or
impairs body functions (neurological, mental, physical, cognitive and
behavioral disorders)
Therefore, if
stress is repeated so frequently that the parasympathetic system is never
able to take action, then the state of excitement will last until the
individual reaches a state of exhaustion, due to the body’s inability to
sustain the situation (continuous pressure) and the onset of psychosomatic
symptoms.
However, the
model described here does not explain the “specificity” of the
effects on individual organs.
Two types of
“specificity” have been proposed: individual and
situational.
According to
the individual-specific response theory (or model), for every individual
there is a specific psychosomatic response model that is genetically
determined or acquired (i.e. everyone has their own personal target organ
system).
According to
the situation-specific response theory, specific environmental stimuli
arouse the same reactions in everyone (e.g. fear and anger generate
specific physiological response patterns).
The cognitive
model (situation-specific) is based on the assumption of a specific
reaction related to personal experience.
Lazarus
suggested that stressful events cause situation-specific and
individual-specific responses in relation to knowledge acquired by
experience (socio-cognitive learning theory). The individual makes
appraisals of his biological, psychological and social resources.
According to
Holmes and Rahe, the incessant flow of adversities and joys (“daily
hassles” and “daily uplifts”) induces similar reactions to major “life
events”. The authors therefore suggest a “life change unit” or “health
effects rating” for major life-changing events.
The
sympathetic nervous system, endocrine system and immune system interact in
response to stressors with a series of adaptive processes aimed at
restoring homeostasis (pre-existing balance/reward). This response is
seemingly mediated by two systems, the HPA (hypothalamus pituitary
adrenal) system and the locus ceruleus-noradrenalin (LC – NA)
system.
The stress
response of the body is rather like a Formula One race car, with its
engine revved up and ready to start a race. All the on-board systems,
mechanisms and instruments have been fine-tuned to provide the utmost
efficiency in terms of performance, safety and control (e.g. engine,
electrical and electronic systems, position monitoring, track viewing
cameras, driver protection devices, etc.), but won’t kick in until the
flag is waved and the race actually starts. If the start is delayed for
whatever reason, all these “functions” are switched off and the vehicle
returns to the “rest” position.
This is what
happens to our body under conditions of stress. All systems (i.e. the
heart, blood vessels, immune system, lungs, sensory organs, digestive
system, and brain) are modified to meet the perceived
threat.
Stressors Stress factors, which
“threaten” the body, may be internal or external.
1) External
stressors: - adverse physical conditions
(including pain, or hot or cold temperatures) - stressful psychological
conditions (psycho-social factors), such as poor working conditions or
relationships that cause pain and suffering.
Human beings,
like animals, can experience any number of external
stressors.
2) Internal
stressors: - physical (inflammations,
infections, metabolic endocrine disorders, etc.) - psychological
(intense justified or unjustified worry).
As far as is
known, psychological stressors are rare or absent in animals. Stressors
can also be defined as acute (short-term duration) or chronic (long-term
duration).
Acute
stress Acute stress is the reaction to an
immediate threat, commonly known as the fight or flight
response. The threat can be any situation that is experienced,
even subconsciously or falsely, as a danger.
Common acute
stressors include:
Under most
circumstances, once the acute threat has passed, the response becomes
inactivated and levels of stress hormones return to normal, a condition
called the relaxation response.
Chronic
stress: Frequently, however, modern life
poses on-going stressful situations that are not short-lived and the urge
to act (to fight or to flee) must be suppressed. Stress, then, becomes
chronic.
Common chronic
stressors include:
-
on-going
highly pressured work
-
long-term
relationship problems
-
loneliness
-
persistent
financial worries.
The
negative effects of acute stress In prehistoric times, the physical
changes in response to stress were an essential adaptation for meeting
natural threats. Even in the modern world, the stress response can be an
asset for raising levels of performance during critical events such as a
sports activity, an important meeting, or in situations of actual danger
or crisis.
If stress
becomes persistent and low-level, however, all parts of the body's stress
mechanism (the brain, heart, lungs, blood vessels, and muscles) become
chronically over- or under-activated. This may produce physical or
psychological damage over time. Acute stress can also be harmful in
certain situations.
For example,
an accumulation of persistent stressful situations, particularly those
that a person cannot easily control (for example, high-pressured work plus
an unhappy relationship).
Persistent
stress following a severe acute response to a traumatic event (such as a
car accident). But also an inefficient or inadequate relaxation response.
And, lastly acute stress in people with serious illness, such as heart
disease, cancer or a neurodegenerative disease.
Psychological Effects of Stress Several studies have suggested
that the inability to adapt to stress is associated with the onset of
depression or anxiety. Statistically, two-thirds of people who experience
stressful situations have an almost six times higher risk of developing
depression within the same month.
There is
evidence that repeated release of stress hormone produces hyperactivity in
the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and modifies normal serotonin
levels, the nerve chemical that is essential for well-being. Certainly,
and obviously, stress affects the quality of life by reducing feelings of
pleasure and satisfaction, and relationships are often threatened.
Pain
Researchers are attempting to find the relationship between
pain and emotion, but the area is complicated by many factors, including
effects of personality types, fear of pain, and stress
itself.
Muscular
and Joint Pain. Chronic pain caused by arthritis
and other conditions may be intensified by long-term stress.
Back ache
(arthritic dorso-lumbar and sacro-lumbar pain) is aggravated by
prolonged stress and the trauma of job dissatisfaction.
Headaches. Tension-type headache episodes
are highly associated with stress and stressful events. It is generally
agreed that tension-type headache sufferers may actually have some
biological predisposition for translating stress into muscle contraction.
Among the wide
range of possible migraine triggers is emotional stress (although the
headaches often erupt after the stress has eased). One study suggested
that women with migraines tend to have personalities that over-respond to
stressful situations. (link:
headache) (link: craniomandibular disorders)
Sleep
Disturbances The tensions of unresolved stress
frequently cause insomnia, generally keeping the stressed person awake or
causing awakening in the middle of the night or early
morning. (link : sleep disorders)
Teeth and
Gums Stress has now been implicated in
increasing the risk for periodontal disease, which is disease in the gums
that can cause tooth loss. (link : gengival bleeding)
Bruxism Rugh and Solberg proved that
everyday stressful events (driving along a motorway, having meetings with
bosses, fighting with one’s spouse or children) lead to an increase in
para-functional activities (clenching and grinding of teeth), having
noticed a rise in EMG potentials using surface electrodes and portable
electromyographs.
This activity
is significantly greater in individuals with temporomandibular joint
dysfunction but non existent in individuals with back ache. Jones also
showed that in women with temporomandibular joint dysfunction the response
of steroid hormones to stress induced experimentally was greater. It
therefore appears to be confirmed that there is a correlation between
stress and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. It also seems that
treatments to control stress (relaxation techniques) lead to significant
benefits in relieving the symptoms of temporomandibular joint
dysfunction. (link: craniomandibular disorders)
Personality
studies on individuals with temporomandibular joint dysfunction and pain
related to bruxism indicate that these people tend to be unable to relieve
their aggressiveness.
However, no
specific personality profile could be correlated to temporomandibular
joint dysfunction
Psychological
treatment, except in cases featuring neuropsychological disorders, must
provide support and care in cases in which pain or dysfunctional
dysmorphism has induced reactive secondary neurosis. (link :psychotherapy) (link: Milton
Erickson.org)
Strategies
for controlling stress Since it is virtually impossible
in modern life to significantly reduce or eliminate the causes of stress,
it would seem more reasonable to learn to control it.
For some
general rules and harmless procedures that could be recommended to
everyone, please refer to: - the smiline checklist (see
introduction) - the strategies below:
RELAXATION
TECHNIQUES :
-
BREATHING
TECHNIQUES (i. g.:
Sudarshan
Kriya®)
-
YOGA
-
THAI
CHI
-
SHIATSU
-
REFLEXOLOGY
-
MEDITATION
-
AUTOGENOUS TRAINING
-
BIOFEEDBACK
-
REIKI
-
MUSCULAR
RELAXATION TECHNIQUES
-
MASSAGE
THERAPY(SWEDISH MASSAGE)
Can be very
useful:
We suggest
also:
And
as general rules:
However,
before making any decisions concerning your lifestyle and habits,
and about your therapy or treatments, I recommend that you: -
consult your doctor to check compatibility between the method you
wish to use and your physical condition, your constitution, talents and
inclinations. - talk about it with your “relationship anchors”,
who are the people who have earned and deserve our trust and
confidence.
In addition to
these strategies, which will be illustrated in more detail later on (i.e.
open air exercise, cold-water all-season swimming, kite flying etc.),
there are many traditional stress-fighting activities that can be
practiced like yoga, disciplines that teach correct breathing). Yoga
will be discussed in a separate chapter.
Here is a
brief comment about correct breathing.
BREATHING The importance of breathing in the
vital balance of the body is evident, since it is the source of our most
important fuel: oxygen. The physiology of breathing belongs outside the
scope of this manual, therefore we recommend obtaining information from
accredited sources…
What we can
instead recommend is a form of breathing that has been known and used for
over 5000 years in yoga. Much research has recently been directed towards
developing more evolved models of “ideal breathing” (see the Sudarshan Kriya®), which are often original and interesting
interpretations of several protocols that yoga has taught and practiced
for centuries in Pranayama. The Sudarshan
Kriya®, developed by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar,
is thus an evolved variant of “yogic breathing”. Sudarshan
Kriya® is an effective physical activity whose aim is to
optimize respiratory function thus acquiring the numerous benefits on the
psychological, neurological and endocrine level that are associated with
correct breathing.
Sri Sri Ravi
Shankar proposes an ethical dimension and lifestyle that have gained
credit and consensus from numerous international bodies and organizations.
Sudarshan Kriya® has also aroused the interest of
official science, which has now included it in countless assessment and
validation protocols, with positive results.
The objectives of Sudarshan
Kriya® – to recover and preserve mental and physical
health – match those of smiline.net, and are based on a treatment approach
that considers the psyche and soma as one and indivisible. |